Sweet Home Alabama (2002)
Some more from Curiel:
But many others don't see it that way. For instance Mike Clark of USA Today:
Despite the name of the movie these guys don't make an appearance |
And most of the negative reviews focus on what Clark was talking about. Yes the film is formulaic and yes it seems 100% manufactured for mucho dinero. By the way, it took in over $180 million against a budget of $38 million so the producers did their jobs. But who cares why it was made or if we've seen it before? These are the kinds of movies we like when we want to see a happy ending with some romance and laughs along the way. I am quite confident the writers and directors weren't attempting to channel their inner Kubrick so why hold these films to such high standards? Sure there are some minor gripes I have about the film. Like where the hell in Alabama does this take place since they seem to be very close to the Gulf of Mexico yet the location looks more close to the Piedmont region? But only I care about stuff like that and you can't let it ruin a movie for you. While I wouldn't pay to see this one I would recommend checking it out if its on TV, which happens about 568 times each year.
IMDb Score: 5.9
Rotten Tomatoes Score: 37% (Click and check out the audience score)
No comments:
Post a Comment